January 30, 2004

Lawsuit Seeks Govt Benefits For Laid-Off Software Workers

Lawsuit Seeks Govt Benefits For Laid-Off Software Workers

By PETER LOFTUS
   Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

NEW YORK -- Laid-off software workers have filed a lawsuit accusing
the U.S. Department of Labor of illegally denying them federal
job-training benefits.

The suit, which seeks class-action status, was filed Jan. 2 in the
U.S. Court of International Trade in New York, said Michael G. Smith,
attorney for the plaintiffs. The suit wants a judge to order the Labor
Department to make laid-off software workers eligible for weekly cash
payments and other benefits under the Trade Adjustment Assistance
program.

In recent years, U.S. companies have laid off thousands of software
workers and other high-technology employees. At the same time,
companies are adding tech staff in India and other developing
countries where labor is inexpensive, in what's known as "offshore
outsourcing." Companies say the shift overseas saves money.

Some displaced American workers have turned to the Trade Adjustment
Assistance program for help. Begun in the 1960's, TAA was designed to
soften the blow to U.S. workers of increased imports or transfers of
jobs overseas. Traditionally, workers in manufacturing have been
eligible for the benefits, which include vouchers for job-training
classes and cash payments after regular unemployment compensation runs
out.

But over the past two years, the Labor Department has ruled many
software workers ineligible for TAA benefits. The Labor Department has
said software and information-technology services don't qualify as
products, or "articles," under TAA guidelines. Only workers who made
more tangible products, such as clothing and furniture, can get TAA
benefits, the department has ruled.

The lawsuit claims that about 10,000 software workers in the U.S.
should be eligible for TAA benefits, but would be ruled ineligible
under current Labor Department practices. Those that have been denied
benefits include former workers at International Business Machines
Corp. (IBM), Electronic Data Systems Corp. (EDS) and Nortel Networks
Corp. (NT) and Motorola Inc. (MOT), according to the lawsuit.

Lead plaintiffs in the lawsuit include James Fusco, a former software
developer at IBM who was denied TAA benefits in June; and Barbara Lisa
Pineau, Dick Young and John Lake, former employees of Computer
Horizons Corp. (CHRZ) who were denied benefits in January 2003. Named
as defendants are Labor Secretary Elaine Chao and Attorney General
John Ashcroft.

Labor Department spokeswoman Lorette Post said the department doesn't
comment on pending litigation. Justice Department spokesman Charles
Miller said the department wouldn't comment because it hasn't yet
filed its response to the trade court.

According to the lawsuit, software workers should be eligible for TAA
benefits because software qualifies as an article under the law that
authorized TAA.

"The Labor Department has been saying that software is not an
article," said Smith, the plaintiffs' attorney. "They've been saying
that software is a service. The programmers that I know - including
myself because I worked in software development for 15 years - we
think that kind of position doesn't comport with the true nature of
software."

A series of federal court opinions since 1969 support the case that
software is an article, Smith said. They have ruled that the
transformation of a "thing" into something "new and different"
qualifies as a production process whose workers are eligible for TAA,
Smith said. Court opinions also have found that software transforms a
computer into a new machine, Smith said.

Smith said there was no evidence in the record of congressional debate
about TAA that suggests software workers shouldn't receive benefits.
TAA was last authorized by Congress in 2002, when it expanded the
benefits and categories of eligible workers.

-By Peter Loftus, Dow Jones Newswires; 201-938-5267;
peter.loftus@dowjones.com

Updated January 28, 2004 3:51 p.m.

Posted by fred7004 at January 30, 2004 05:29 PM
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?